首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of variational multiscale models for the large eddy simulation of turbulent incompressible flows
【2h】

Assessment of variational multiscale models for the large eddy simulation of turbulent incompressible flows

机译:用于湍流不可压缩流动的大涡模拟的变分多尺度模型的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this work we study the performance of some variational multiscale models (VMS) in the large eddy simulation (LES) of turbulent flows. We consider VMS models obtained by different subgrid scale approximations which include either static or dynamic subscales, linear or nonlinear multiscale splitting, and different choices of the subscale space. After a brief review of these models, we discuss some implementation aspects particularly relevant to the simulation of turbulent flows, namely the use of a skew symmetric form of the convective term and the computation of projections when orthogonal subscales are used. We analyze the energy conservation (and numerical dissipation) of the alternative VMS formulations, which is numerically evaluated. In the numerical study, we have considered three well known problems: the decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence, the Taylor–Green vortex problem and the turbulent flow in a channel. We compare the results obtained using different VMS models, paying special attention to the effect of using orthogonal subscale spaces. The VMS results are also compared against classical LES scheme based on filtering and the dynamic Smagorinsky closure. Altogether, our results show the tremendous potential of VMS for the numerical simulation of turbulence. Further, we study the sensitivity of VMS to the algorithmic constants and analyze the behavior in the small time step limit. We have also carried out a computational cost comparison of the different formulations. Out of these experiments, we can state that the numerical results obtained with the different VMS formulations (as far as they converge) are quite similar. However, some choices are prone to instabilities and the results obtained in terms of computational cost are certainly different. The dynamic orthogonal subscales model turns out to be best in terms of efficiency and robustness.
机译:在这项工作中,我们研究了湍流大涡模拟(LES)中某些变分多尺度模型(VMS)的性能。我们考虑通过不同的子网格尺度近似获得的VMS模型,这些子网格尺度近似包括静态或动态子尺度,线性或非线性多尺度分裂以及子尺度空间的不同选择。在简要回顾了这些模型之后,我们讨论了一些与湍流模拟特别相关的实现方面,即使用对流项的斜对称形式和使用正交子尺度时的投影计算。我们分析了替代VMS配方的节能(和数值耗散),并对其进行了数值评估。在数值研究中,我们考虑了三个众所周知的问题:均质各向同性湍流的衰减,泰勒-格林涡旋问题和通道中的湍流。我们比较了使用不同VMS模型获得的结果,并特别注意了使用正交子尺度空间的效果。还将VMS结果与基于过滤和动态Smagorinsky闭包的经典LES方案进行了比较。总之,我们的结果显示了VMS在湍流数值模拟中的巨大潜力。此外,我们研究了VMS对算法常数的敏感性,并在较小的时间步长限制内分析了行为。我们还对不同配方进行了计算成本比较。从这些实验中,我们可以指出,使用不同的VMS公式(就其收敛而言)获得的数值结果非常相似。但是,某些选择容易产生不稳定,并且在计算成本方面获得的结果肯定不同。动态正交分量表模型在效率和鲁棒性方面被证明是最好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号